Pool Insights
·FinalHow the field actually played out — the most popular picks, the golfers who returned the most scoring per point, and the team that would have won it all, across 19 entries in 2 pools.
Most popular pick
Si Woo Kim
On 21% of entries
Best value golfer
Jackson Suber
-23 at 5 points
Optimal team score
-105
121 lineups tie for best
Jackson Suber
Scored -23 at a cost of 5 points — the most scoring returned per point spent.
Tiers use the standard auto-pool value bands (Tier 1 = top 10 in the world, down to Unranked), so they are comparable across every pool. Lower average score is the better value.
Casualties
85
Survivors
70
Survival rate
45%
The most painful loss was Aaron Rai, rostered by 16% of entries when the cut fell.
-105
75 of 75 points used
The best possible team under the standard 75-point cap, counting the best 4 of 5 golfers.
121 different lineups tie for this score — the bench slots were score-irrelevant, so any cheap golfers that fit the remaining cap would do.
Adam Headley
Widely picked at 5% ownership but finished +12 — the most-rostered disappointment.
Best
-101
Average
-27
Worst
+10
Si Woo Kim is the most popular pick, appearing on 21% of all entries (4 entries).
Jackson Suber is the best value, scoring -23 at a cost of 5 points.
The optimal team scored -105 under the canonical 75-point cap. The counting golfers were Wyndham Clark, Si Woo Kim, Jackson Suber, Scottie Scheffler.
Aaron Rai was the most-rostered casualty, held by 16% of entries when the cut fell.
Tier 1 is the best value tier, averaging -27. Tournament-wide tiers use the standard auto-pool value bands so they are comparable across pools.
